HIPAAnotes Volume One, Numbers 18-20
No. 18 (3/7/01):
HIPAAterm: Privacy/Security Officer: One and the Same?
HIPAA requires covered entities to have a central point of control
for security issues, as well as a designated Privacy Official. Many
organizations have assumed that the same person will fill these
two roles.
A small covered entity, such as a physician’s office, will most
likely combine these two roles. However, many argue that a large
entity should have two different positions.
The American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)
strongly suggests that the Privacy Official be a HIM professional,
since the development and implementation of organizational privacy
policies and procedures has traditionally been an HIM role.
Obviously, a Security Officer should have information security
training, the most recognized being a Certified Information Systems
Security Professional (CISSP).
HIPAA doesn't offer any guidance on this issue. It neither requires
nor prohibits “dual-hatting” someone. Once again, HIPAA's orientation
is flexibility and scalability, not prescriptive limits.
For more information, go to: http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/privacy/
No. 19 (3/14/00)
HIPAAreg: Transaction Standards: Friend, NOT Foe
Has your organization started working on implementing the HIPAA
Transaction Reg yet? Did you know that this standard is where most
healthcare entities can save significant dollars?
About 400 different formats are currently used nationwide to process
electronic health care claims. This lack of standardization has
made it difficult and expensive to develop and maintain software.
Its cumbersome complexity also has created a widely-criticized system
that is expensive and inefficient for the providers and payers who
must use it each day.
The HIPAA Transaction Reg streamlines transactions through standardization.
The national standards enable providers to submit any transaction
in the SAME format and coding to any payer in the country. Similarly,
payer-initiated transactions with providers, such as remittance
advices and referral authorizations, must share standard formats,
under the new regulation.
Payers and providers will be able to substantially reduce administrative
costs and processing delays created by redundancy, errors and the
overall complexity and slowness of our current healthcare transactions
environment. Virtually every healthcare organization will realize
cost savings mounting into the thousands -- as well as other benefits
-- every month following implementation.
For more information on the Transactions Reg, go to: http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/tcs/
No. 20 (3/20/01)
HIPAAreg: Transactions: Not Just for Vendors
Many providers are ignoring the transaction reg, assuming that
their clearinghouse or software vendor will take care of this one.
However, the reg requires certain data to be maintained and transmitted.
For most providers, about 50% of the required data for the Institutional
837 Claim format is not currently collected or maintained electronically.
And that's just one of the required transactions.
Here are a few of the required data elements you may not currently
have in electronic form:
- Pregnancy Indicator - May be in your clinical systems but not
in your billing module.
- Provider Taxonomy Code - A new classification system that will
be required for all practitioner information included in the claim.
It is used to codify provider type and provider area of specialization
for all medical related providers.
- Related Causes Code - Required when the claim is for an accident,
employment related, due to abuse, etc.
- Country Codes - Required whenever an address is outside the
U.S. If your institution is a referral center for other countries
you will need to report this code. Also, with more Americans traveling
overseas, this code's use may increase (i.e., to report the site
of an accident).
For more information, go to:
http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/tcs/
No. 21 (3/28/01)
TechTerm:
Firewalls - Further into the Ring of Fire
In one of our first HIPAAnotes, we defined "firewall."
To briefly summarize, a firewall filters everything coming into
your network and leaving your network. By doing this, it can protect
your network.
A firewall can also provide an important logging and auditing
function. The system can provide summaries of what kind of traffic
is going through the firewalls and what/how many attempts have been
made to break into your network.
As mentioned in our first firewall note, though, firewalls implement
policy. First, you need to decide what type of access policy is
appropriate for your organization. Then, choose the firewall solution
which best suits your risk tolerance.
For more information on firewalls and other technology, go to:
http://www.hipaadvisory.com/tech/
|