HIPAA ction
HIPAAdvisory > HIPAAction > HIPAAnotes > Archives Phoenix Health Systems



HIPAAnotes Volume Three, November 2003

No. 44 – National Provider ID is Coming - Better late than never!

On October 16, 2003, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) submitted the "Standard Unique Health Care Provider Identifier" -- commonly referred to as the "National Provider Identifier (NPI)" -- regulation to the White House Office of Management & Budget (OMB) for final approval. It then typically takes between two weeks to 90 days until the final rule is published. The industry is anticipating that the final regulations will be placed on display at the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC sometime in the later days of December 2003.

Most healthcare providers would have appreciated the NPI being in place at the same time the Transactions and Code Sets (TCS) regulation was finalized. Many healthcare providers have frantically been requesting and using physicians' Social Security numbers or employer identification numbers (EIN) to satisfy the 4010-A1 implementation guides. When the NPI regulations are finalized, the NPI will be the preferred provider identifier, replacing the use of the Social Security number or EIN when reporting a healthcare claim or encounter to a payer.

Although only HHS and OMB know the actual final version of the regulation, it is assumed that the NPI is a unique identification number for healthcare providers that will be used by all health plans. All covered entities will use the NPIs in the administrative and financial transactions specified by HIPAA.

The proposed rule defined the NPI as an 8-position alphanumeric identifier. HHS has received numerous comments preferring a 10-position number identifier with a check digit in the last position to help detect keying errors. The proposed NPI does not contain embedded intelligence such as information about the healthcare provider.

Our next two HIPAAnotes will explore some of the implementation issues surrounding NPI. Watch for them!


Josef Spencer, Director
Phoenix Health Systems

No. 45 – NPI, Part 2: Who Gets a Unique Identifier & How Do You Get One?

The long-awaited finalization of the National Provider Identifier (NPI) is in its final stage of approval. Similar to other HIPAA regulations, covered entities will have two years and two months to comply with the NPI regulation. However, the implementation of the NPI regulation will be slightly different. Besides the requirement to use the NPI in appropriate HIPAA transactions, providers will be required to register with the organization that will administer the NPI through the National Provider System (NPS). The NPS is the administrative system envisioned for supporting the registry of the NPI.

NPIs will be issued to healthcare providers, which will allow them to submit claims or conduct other transactions specified by HIPAA. A healthcare provider is defined as an individual, group, or organization that provides medical or other health services or supplies. This does not include health industry employees, such as admissions staff, billing personnel, or technicians who support the provision of healthcare, but do not provide actual healthcare services to the patient.

The NPI is proposed to be issued from the NPS based on information entered into the NPS by one or more organizations known as “enumerators.” Enumerators could be a registry, private organization, federal health plans, state agency, health plan, or any combination of these.

The enumerators are proposed to have the responsibility of entering identifying information about a healthcare provider into the system, conducting data validation, notifying the healthcare provider of its NPI, and updating information about the healthcare provider as necessary.

When the final rule is published, the NPS will begin assigning NPIs to healthcare providers. Because of the enormity and complexity of this task, the Department of Health and Human Services recommended in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that the assignment of the NPI be completed in phases. The suggested implementation is as follows:

  • Providers that submit electronic Medicare transactions will automatically be assigned an NPI.
  • Non-Medicare health plans such as Medicaid and HMOs will then “phase-in” enumeration of their providers. Providers using these programs will not need to apply for an NPI, but will have to decide which health plan will provide it.
  • Providers who do not participate in any Federal health plans or Medicaid, but who transmit standard HIPAA transactions electronically, will have to apply directly to the new Federal registry for their NPIs.
  • Finally, providers who don’t participate in any Federal plans or transmit the electronic transactions covered by HIPAA are expected to be enumerated after all other providers.

The National Provider Identifier will be retained for the life of the healthcare provider. If a healthcare provider goes out of business or dies, the NPI will be de-activated.

Having a unique identifier for each provider in our healthcare system will help to streamline electronic transactions, as intended by Administrative Simplification.


Josef Spencer, Director
Phoenix Health Systems


No. 46 – NPI, Part 3: Please, Not Another Identifier!

The establishment of a National Provider Identifier (NPI) will undoubtedly cause confusion before simplifying claims processing. Today, the health care industry uses numerous identifiers in a single claim, including: Social Security number (SSN), employer identification number (EIN), drug enforcement number, state license number, Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN), taxonomy, and payer-specific identifiers. Deciding which identifiers remain and which will be eliminated will surely fuel more questions. The reason for the many different identifiers stems from the fact that these identifiers have been assigned by the various health plans, as well as government agencies at both the state and federal levels. Since there has never been a "central agency" for assigning these identifiers, it is not surprising that that the industry has such duplication and variability in this area.

The objective of the NPI is to issue one unique identifier per provider. NPIs must be used by all providers, and must be accepted by all clearinghouses and health plans when using any of the standard electronic transactions that have been mandated by HIPAA. In its purest form, the NPI should replace the use of SSN or EIN for the purpose of provider identification.

The NPI will eventually replace the UPIN in the Medicare program. NPIs and UPINs will not be used concurrently on HIPAA transactions. Once the NPI is assigned to Medicare providers, reports and files will be created to crosswalk UPINs to NPIs.

The NPI will not replace taxonomy. The purpose of the taxonomy is to document the type of provider service, not identify a specific provider. The NPI will not replace the drug enforcement number.

The NPI must be used in connection with the electronic transactions identified in HIPAA. However, the proposed rule also outlined other uses for the NPI, including:

  1. by healthcare providers to identify themselves in healthcare transactions identified in HIPAA or on related correspondence;
  2. by healthcare providers to identify other healthcare providers in health care transactions or on related correspondence;
  3. by healthcare providers on prescriptions;
  4. by health plans in their internal provider files to process transactions and communicate with healthcare providers;
  5. by health plans to coordinate benefits with other health plans;
  6. by healthcare clearinghouses in their internal files to create and process standard transactions and to communicate with healthcare providers and health plans;
  7. by electronic patient record systems to identify treating healthcare providers in patient medical records;
  8. by the Department of Health and Human Services to cross-reference healthcare providers in fraud and abuse files, and other program integrity files;
  9. for any other lawful activity requiring individual identification of healthcare providers, including activities related to the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

Josef Spencer, Director
Phoenix Health Systems


Vol. 03 Archive Index

Go to TOP


HIPAAdvisory.com
Phoenix Health Systems
Copyright 2000-2006. All rights reserved.

HIPAAwareness

HIPAAcompliance

Privacy

Security

Transactions
& Identifiers

E-Health


HIPAA / LAW:
Legal Q/A

HIPAA / SECURE:
Security Q/A

HIPAAnote:
Byte of HIPAA


HIPAAlinks

HIPAAFAQ

Models, Samples
& Templates