|
|
AHIMA Calls Blue Cross Blue Shield $43 Billion
Price Tag
for Confidentiality Overblown
December 17, 1999 -- The requirements of healthcare
confidentiality proposals currently being debated in Congress could
cost the industry $43 billion over the next five years. A recent
study conducted by the Robert E. Nolan Company for Blue Cross and
Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) estimates that the price tag for
universal health privacy standards would exceed the costs of the
Children's Health Insurance Program ($24 billion) and the Medicare
prescription drug benefit ($37 billion).
The report has fueled resistance among those in the industry who
believe the proposals represent an overly bureaucratic, potentially
damaging solution to a small problem. "While we believe that privacy
protection is important, we do not believe it must be unduly complicated
as to put quality at risk," said Allan Korn, MD, Senior Vice President
and Chief Medical Officer of BCBSA. The report's figures -- including
the $9.1 billion in projected costs for tracking and disclosure
and $23.4 billion for infrastructure changes -- have been disputed
by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA),
an industry group representing health information management professionals.
AHIMA's President-elect, Margaret Skurka, says healthcare organizations
are already investing in information systems that carry out multiple
tasks, confidentiality being just one. Ms. Skurka believes the study
measures the costs of entire systems rather than just the components
related to confidentiality. She also points out that most states
require healthcare providers to grant access to medical records
and permit organizations to charge a fee to cover costs. Any proposal
passed by Congress would likely follow this model, reducing the
$9.1 billion figure cited by Blue Cross. "There is no doubt that
implementing confidentiality legislation or regulations will cost
some money, though less than what Blue Cross estimates," said Ms.
Skurka. "In any case, a price tag should not stop us from doing
what is right for our patients."
|
 |
 |