HIPAA action
HIPAA dvisory
 HIPAAdvisory > HIPAAction > HIPAA/LAW: Legal Q/A Phoenix Health Systems
news
regs
action
tech
wares
alert
live
latest
online HIPAA training
HIPAAstore
HIPAA help desk
search
contact us
site map

HIPAA/LAW: Legal Q/A
January 2002


"Organized Arrangements vs. Affiliated Entities"

by Steve Fox, Esq., & Rachel Wilson, Esq., Pepper Hamilton LLP

QUESTION: What is the difference between an organized health care arrangement (OHCA) and affiliated entities?

ANSWER: There are two primary differences between affiliated covered entities and an OHCA. First, affiliated entities and an OHCA differ from one another regarding the way that information may be used or disclosed by and between the covered entities that populate them. Second, the common required element shared between the components of an affiliated entity and the participants in an OHCA are different.

Entities sharing common ownership or control may adopt the "affiliated entity" designation recognized under the Privacy Standards. For example, a corporation which owns hospitals in several different states could opt to make such an election. The designation basically functions to erase the individual identity of each separate entity and create one single covered entity for the purpose of complying with the Privacy Standards. The exception is that each component of an affiliated entity is required to erect firewalls to protect against the improper use or disclosure of protected health information (PHI) within the affiliated entity. Because they enjoy the fiction of existence as a single entity under the Privacy Standards, affiliated entities may utilize a single consent form and notice of privacy practices.

Unlike an OHCA, discussed below, the covered functions performed by each distinct component of an affiliated entity are not required to be similar to one another or arise out of a single integrated enterprise or practice.

Forming an OHCA is generally, but not exclusively, permissible in those integrated care settings where participants need to share PHI about their patients in order to manage and benefit the common enterprise. One example would be a hospital setting where both the hospital and the physician with staff privileges provide treatment. The principal concept underlying the OHCA is the idea that in certain integrated settings, covered entities need the unrestricted right to share health information. Accordingly, the Privacy Standards permit participants in an OHCA to use and disclose PHI for the treatment, payment, and health care operations of the entire arrangement just as they would for their own such purposes. Toward that end, component entities may join together to promulgate a joint notice of privacy practices as well as a joint consent.

In general, component entities of an OHCA may share PHI for the joint management and operations of the arrangement without patient consent or authorization. This is true except where direct providers are included in the arrangement. In that event, a general consent is required before any component entity would be permitted to use or disclose PHI.

Read past HIPAA Legal Q/A articles.


Steve Fox, Esq., is a partner at the Washington, DC office of Pepper Hamilton LLP. This article was co-authored by Rachel H. Wilson, Esq., of Pepper Hamilton LLP. www.pepperlaw.com

Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.

Go to TOP