January 2003 News Archives:
January
27, 2003 Health Data Monitored for Bioterror Warning
The New York Times reports the government is building a computerized
network that will collect and analyze health data of people in eight
major cities to monitor for bioterror attack. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) is to lead the surveillance effort
which represents a sharp swing to civilian leadership in a field
the military pioneered and once dominated. But even in civilian
hands, the emerging network has raised concerns that such surveillance
may violate individual medical privacy rights.
Read
more.
January
27, 2003 Utah Developing Database of Residents' Genetic Info
According to the Kaiser Daily Health Report, Utah Governor Michael
Leavitt (R) announced in his Jan. 21 State of the State speech a
new biotechnology/human genetics project called GenData. Genetic
information will be collected from state residents and put into
a database to help researchers find treatments for diseases such
as diabetes and cancer. The nonprofit formed by the state, the University
of Utah, and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation will be taking steps
to pass legislation to further protect the privacy and security
of information in the database.
Read
more about Utah's GenData project.
January
24, 2003 From OMB: Regulations.gov open; Prototype for Interagency
EDI Coming Federal Computer Week reports the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) unveiled the Regulations.gov portal last week,
the first project under the e-rulemaking electronic government initiative.
Regulations.gov is intended to provide a single place for all citizens
to search, access and comment on proposed federal rules.
OMB will also begin testing by March a prototype of a system that
will make possible interagency transactions, reports Government
Computer News. OMB will modify the Navys E-Commerce Online
portal to interface with the Treasury Departments Intragovernmental
Payment and Collection system. OMB also must create new electronic
data interchange data sets and file formats to use the Navys
system, McBride
Read
more about Regulations.gov.
Read
more about OMB's transactions prototype.
January
24, 2003 Security Researcher Discovers Master Keys Are Easy
to Create A researcher for AT&T Labs-Research has discovered
that a copy of the master key for an entire building can be created
starting with any key from that building, the New York Times reports.
All that is required is access to a key, the lock that it opens,
a metal file, and a few key blanks. The researcher, Matt Blaze,
reports in a paper submitted for publication in a computer security
journal that "it required only a few minutes to carry out,
even when using a file to cut the keys." "I view the problem
as pretty serious," Marc Weber Tobias, a locks expert who works
as a security consultant to law enforcement agencies says, adding
that the technique was so simple, "an idiot could do it."
Read
more.
January
23, 2003 Security Rule Author Predicts February Publication
In an exclusive interview this month with Theresa Defino, Editor
of Ingenix's "Practical Guidance on HIPAA and E-Health for
the Physician Practice" newsletter, the original author of
the Final Security Rule speculates it will be published in February,
after the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has cleared it.
John Parmigiani, director of enterprise standards for what was
then the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), and his staff
wrote the final rule nearly four years ago. Parmigiani left the
government in February 2000 and is now national practice director
for HIPAA compliance services at CTG Health Care Solutions, a consulting
firm headquartered in Cincinnati. The rule, which has since been
rewritten and modified, finally made its way to OMB on January 13.
"Once approved by OMB, the final rule then has to be published
in the Federal Register for 60 days before the 24 months compliance
countdown begins," Parmigiani tells Practical Guidance. "So,
at the earliest, we are looking at a compliance date somewhere in
the spring of 2005."
Parmigiani thinks the new final rule "should not deviate substantially
from the proposed rule because the proposed rule was based on good
security practices for any business engaged in electronic commerce."
"The same core values that were part of the proposed rule should
also be integral ingredients of the final rule," Parmigiani
says.
Some anticipated changes from the proposed rule include:
- Eliminating the electronic signature requirement;
- Changing terminology to reference business associate agreements
instead of chain of trust agreements;
- Clarifying rule requirements as to what is mandatory and what
is only recommended.
"(I)n its attempts to synchronize the final security rule
with the privacy rule," Parmigiani adds, "OMB could very
well return the proposed final rule to HHS if it finds shortcomings
or deems modifications [are] needed." But Parmigiani warns
that it would be a mistake to wait until a compliance date passes
to implement security measures. "The publication of the final
rule is somewhat of a moot point, however, since compliance with
the privacy rule by April 14 implements the security standards,
de facto, because of the requirement that necessary administrative,
physical, and technical safeguards" be in place for protected
health information, he says.
Stay on top of the HIPAA
regs publication schedule with our up-to-date Compliance Calendar.
January
23, 2003 SC Physicians Appeal HIPAA Case Physicians
in South Carolina, as well as the South Carolina Medical Association,
were set to argue today before a federal appellate court that the
HIPAA privacy regulations are onerous and unconstitutional, reports
Modern Physician.
Other states' medical societies are supporting the case, though
the American Medical Association (AMA) and national specialty medical
societies are not participating. The physicians and medical societies
have no problem with the transaction rules, believing that computerized
transactions actually save money.
The plaintiffs say HHS has no constitutional power to develop the
massive privacy regulations that will affect an estimated 2 million
healthcare entities that handle personal healthcare information,
according to an attorney who will present the case to a three-judge
panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta.
A federal trial court in Columbia, SC, threw the case out last
August, ruling that HHS does in fact have legislative authority
to create and enforce healthcare privacy regulations.
Read
more.
January
22, 2003 Bill Would Set Infosec Standards Federal Computer
Week reports Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) introduced a bill last week
that is designed to better position the federal government to serve
as a model in information security. The Cyber Security Leadership
Act (S. 187) would direct the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to establish higher standards for federal information
security. NIST would develop the standards after agencies performed
comprehensive analyses of their networks and systems to discover
where weaknesses lie.
Read
more.
Read
the text of S. 187.
January
22, 2003 CDC Anthrax Study Violated Privacy Regs The
United Press International (UPI) reports the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) violated federal regulations when it
failed to notify postal workers potentially exposed to anthrax in
the 2001 attacks that their confidential medical information would
be included in a study, medical privacy experts and postal employees
told United Press International. The CDC's failure to notify the
workers is a serious infraction of federal regulations set up to
protect medical research participants, experts on research protections
told UPI. Due to the sensitive nature of medical information, researchers
are required to inform subjects why the information is being collected
and how their privacy will be protected.
Read
more.
January
22, 2003 Government Data Mining Raises Privacy Concerns
According to ComputerWorld, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the ranking
Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter last week
to US Attorney General John Ashcroft, asking the Department of Justice
to explain the extent to which data mining tools are being used
in homeland security. Specifically, Leahy expressed concern about
the Pentagon's Total Information Awareness (TIA) program mining
data obtained through credit card purchases and medical records.
"TIA is intended, according to Department of Defense officials,
to generate tools for monitoring the daily personal transactions
by Americans and others, including tracking the use of passports,
driver's licenses, credit cards, airline tickets, and rental cars,"
Leahy wrote. One TIA software tool, code-named Genoa, may have already
been delivered by DARPA to the Justice Department, Leahy said. As
a result, Leahy has asked for a status report on all TIA software
projects, including Evidence Extraction and Link Discovery, a previously
unknown tool called Genisys and a program called the Translingual
Information Detection, Extraction and Summarization, or TIDES.
Read
Leahy's letter to Ashcroft.
Read
ComputerWorld's article, Government Data Mining Raises Privacy Concerns."
Read
the Washington Post's article, "Hearings Sought on Information
Awareness Office.
January
21, 2003 Los Alamos May Have Lost Hard Drive Federal
Computer Week reports a computer hard drive containing classified
information may be missing from the Los Alamos National Laboratory,
but because of an inventory mistake, officials say they may never
know. As part of an ongoing effort to put an end to management and
security scandals at the lab, the staff spent much of the past two
years taking inventory of the lab's equipment. Last October, workers
at the lab found a security bar code that was associated with an
empty metal carrier that might have held a hard drive. The worker
who put the bar code on the carrier admitted he had not looked inside
at the time.
Read
more.
January
16, 2003 Old Hard Drives Yield Data Bonanza ZDNet reports
two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduate students
have uncovered a treasure trove of personal and corporate information
on used disk drives. The students at MITs Laboratory of Computer
Science bought 158 disk drives for less than $1,000 on the Web and
at swap meets. Scavenging through the drives, they found more than
5,000 credit card numbers, medical reports, and detailed personal
and corporate financial information. Their findings, titled "Remembrance
of Data Passed: A Study of Disk Sanitation," are being published
in the January/February 2003 issue of IEEE Security and Privacy,
a journal published by the IEEE Computer Society.
Read
ZDNet's article.
Read
the report, "Remembrance of Data Passed: A Study of Disk Sanitation"
(PDF).
January
15, 2003 OCR Hiring Privacy Specialists for Nationwide Outreach
In an effort to allay health care industry confusion and anxiety
as the
April 14 compliance date nears, HHS' Office of Civil Rights (OCR),
charged with overseeing HIPAA Privacy Rule compliance, is looking
to hire Privacy Program Specialists to provide outreach and education.
The Privacy Specialists, working out of 11 Regional Offices, will
fan out across the country to increase awareness of covered entities'
responsibilities and the public's rights under the Rule.
As part of their duties, the regional Privacy Specialists will:
- help conduct investigations;
- respond to phone and written inquiries about the Privacy Rule
from covered
entities and the public;
- present the Rule's requirements in meetings, conferences, seminars,
and
workshops; and
- serve as subject matter experts on the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Applications are being accepted online until the closing date of
February 4,
2003.
Read
more.
January
14, 2003 JCAHO Revises Business Associate Agreement with
Hospitals AHANews reports the Joint Commission on Accreditation
of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) has released its revised business
associate agreement that hospitals must sign as part of the application
process for a JCAHO survey to make the agreement workable and acceptable
to hospitals and compliant with HIPAA. The American Hospital Association
(AHA) says the revised agreement appropriately addresses hospital
concerns about an earlier version that was posted on JCAHO's web
site just before the holidays.
Read JCAHO's revised
BA agreement (PDF).
January
14, 2003 HHS to Hold Conferences on Privacy Rule HHS
will be holding four national one-day conferences, two in February
and two in March, on the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The conferences are
designed to provide an opportunity to hear from and interact with
officials who developed the Privacy Rule and will be responsible
for interpreting and enforcing the rule. The HHS Office for Civil
Rights (OCR) will provide an expert faculty who will answer questions
from attendees during question-and-answer sessions following their
presentations.
The conferences will go over:
- The principles underlying the Privacy Rule.
- How the preemption rules create a national floor of privacy
protections.
- Who is a covered health care provider.
- The implications of being an affiliated covered entity, a hybrid,
or in an
organized health care arrangement.
- "Business associate" issues.
- What type of information is protected under the HIPAA Privacy
Rule and what is meant by the terms "use," "disclosure,"
"minimum necessary," and "incidental disclosures."
- The Notice of Privacy Practices requirement.
- When it is necessary to obtain an authorization to use or disclose
PHI and what constitutes a valid authorization.
- The right of patient to access, amend, and obtain an accounting
of disclosures of patient health information.
- When to use an authorization for research and when research
may be conducted without an authorization.
- How research authorizations pre-dating the compliance date
are treated.
- Appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards.
- The requirements to train the workforce on covered entity policies
and procedures.
- The OCR complaint investigation and compliance review authority.
View our February conference
calendar.
View our March conference calendar.
January
14, 2003 Final Security Rule, Transactions Modification on
Their Way The Final Rules on the "HIPAA Security Standards"
and "Modification to Standards for Electronic Transactions
and Code Sets" were received by the White House Office of Management
& Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OMB/OIRA)
yesterday for review. Final clearance takes between two weeks and
90 days, at which point, the final version of the regulations are
placed on display at the Government Printing Office (GPO) in Washington,
DC, and then published in the Federal Register.
January
13, 2003 AHIMA to Feds: Need Final Security Rule Now
The American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) sent
a letter last week to the Departments of Health and Human Services
(HHS) and Defense (DOD), raising serious concerns with two events
which occurred at the end of 2002 that highlight a need for the
publication of the final HIPAA security rule.
The letter, addressed to HHS Sec. Tommy Thompson and DOD Sec. Donald
Rumsfeld, and copied to officials at the White House, Office of
Management and Budget, Sens. Bill Frist, Thomas Daschle, and David
Hobson, and Reps. Nancy Johnson and Pete Stark, points out HHS'
failure to issue a final notice for HIPAA Security regulations,
as anticipated on December 27, 2002, and the theft on December 14
of thousands of health records by a DOD contractor, TriWest.
Read AHIMA's letter
to HHS/DOD Secretaries on Security.
January
10, 2003 DOD Medical System Security to be Reviewed According
to iHealthBeat, DOD has formed a task force to review security policies
for health information systems at military medical facilities worldwide,
Federal Computer Week reports. The move follows the theft last month
of computer equipment containing the medical records of more than
500,000 military health beneficiaries. A $100,000 reward is being
offered for information that helps lead to the arrest and conviction
of the perpetrators who stole the computers from the Phoenix offices
of TriWest Healthcare Alliance, part of DOD's TriCare system.
A Defense health official said the theft poses no threat to the
Composite Health Care System II, the Defense Departments (DOD)
pilot computerized medical system. CHCS II is not part of Tricare
and its information is stored at very secure sites.
Read
more.
Read
the New York Times' article, "Officials Say Troops Risk Identity
Theft After Burglary."
FoxNews'
article, "Theft of 500,000 Defense Employee Records Could Be
One of the Largest ID Theft Cases Ever."
January
8, 2003 Rape Crisis Center Refuses Records Release Medical
Newswire reports a rape crisis center in Massachusetts refused a
judges order to surrender records of counseling it provided
to an alleged teen victim. Superior Court judge Peter Agnes said
he would take the centers position under advisement, but also
noted that he may decide to fine the center. An attorney for the
center said that a rape victims privacy must be protected
and added that the defense should only be permitted to use case
data supplied at trial.
Read
more.
January
7, 2003 White House Trims Cyber-Security Plan The Washington
Post reports that the next draft of the Bush Administration's cyber-security
policy, which was due to be released by the end of December, has
been circulating among government offices and industry executives
this week, and was obtained by the Associated Press. President Bush
is expected to sign the plan, entitled the "National Strategy
to Secure Cyberspace," and announce the proposals within several
weeks.
The administration has reduced by nearly half its initiatives to
tighten security for vital computer networks, giving more responsibility
to the new Department of Homeland Security and eliminating an earlier
proposal to consult regularly with privacy experts. However, the
draft notes that "care must be taken to respect privacy interests
and other civil liberties." It also noted that the new Homeland
Security Department will include a privacy officer to ensure that
monitoring the Internet for attacks would balance privacy and civil
liberties concerns.
Meanwhile, eWeek reports an independent advisory panel, appointed
by Congress and headed by former Virginia Gov. James Gilmore, issued
a report that is sharply critical of the cyber-security policy,
saying it is tepid and relies too much on the cooperation of the
private sector. The report was highly critical of the Bush administration's
information security efforts in general and specifically criticized
the national strategy as being "a small step indeed."
Read
the Washington Post's article, "A Pared-Back Security Initiative."
Read
eWeek's article, "Advisory Panel Slams Bush's Cyber-security Policy."
January
6, 2003 Survey: Industry Progress on HIPAA is Strong
TechRepublic reported last month on Gartner's 6th HIPAA panel study,
to assess how the healthcare industry is responding to current and
impending HIPAA-compliance regulations. The survey, finished in
August 2002, looks at how healthcare organizations are responding
to the challenges of HIPAA over time by studying a representative
sample of 172 randomly-selected providers and payers. The survey
found for the first time that most have embarked on tasks such as
assigned privacy and security officers, testing systems, identifying
formal employee training methods, and implementing privacy and security
policies and procedures.
Most respondents are working on privacy; 85 percent report having
at least started developing revised policies and procedures. Although
almost 70 percent of respondents report that they have begun implementing
the transactions standards, organizations are largely at the mercy
of their software vendors, most of whom are still working on their
compliance upgrades. For this reason, HIPAA.org launched last October
an online directory of software products and what HIPAA transactions
that product supports now.
Read
more.
Take our HIPAA
survey to see where your organization stands in relation to the
rest of the industry.
View
HIPAA.org's Practice Management System Directory.
January
6, 2003 Homeland Security Office Told to Answer Queries on
National IDs The Office of Homeland Security lost the first
round in a legal fight to keep its activities secret, reports the
Washington Post. A federal judge in Washington ruled the Office
will have to answer questions about its power over other federal
agencies if it wants to have a lawsuit seeking access to its records
dismissed. The ruling favored the Electronic Privacy Information
Center (EPIC), which is trying to get Homeland Security records
on proposals for a national driver's license and for a "trusted
flyer" program that relies on biometric information to identify
airline passengers.
Read
more.
|